Drama ( The Zoo Story)
Name : Ratna Adi Tejaningrum
NIM : A 320 080 148
Class : G
1. The Characters
a. Peter
Peter is in early forty, married, a middle-class publishing executive, embarrassed, childish, serious person. he has two daughters, two cats and two parakeets, and he lives in ignorance of the world outside his settled life.
b. Jerry
Jerry is an isolated and disheartened man who lives in a boarding house and is very troubled. He is in his late 30s, carelessly dressed, once muscular and handsome. He is weary.
2. Plot
Peter is a middle-class publishing executive with a wife, two daughters, two cats and two parakeets who lives in ignorance of the world outside his settled life. Jerry is an isolated and disheartened man who lives in a boarding house and is very troubled. These men meet on a park bench in New York City's Central Park. Jerry is desperate to have a meaningful conversation with another human being. He intrudes on Peter’s peaceful state by interrogating him and forcing him to listen to stories from his life, including "THE STORY OF JERRY AND THE DOG", and the reason behind his visit to the zoo. The action is linear, unfolding in front of the audience in “real time”. The elements of ironic humor and unrelenting dramatic suspense are brought to a climax when Jerry brings his victim down to his own savage level.
The catalyst for the shocking ending transpires when Peter announces, "I really must be going home;..." Jerry, in response, begins to tickle Peter. Peter giggles, laughs and agrees to listen to Jerry finish telling "what happened at the zoo." At the same time Jerry begins pushing Peter off the bench. Peter decides to fight for his territory on the bench and becomes angry. Unexpectedly, Jerry pulls a knife on Peter, and then drops it as initiative for Peter to grab. When Peter holds the knife defensively, Jerry charges him and impales himself on the knife. Bleeding on the park bench, Jerry finishes his zoo story by bringing it into the immediate present, "Could I have planned all this. No... no, I couldn't have. But I think I did." Horrified, Peter runs away from Jerry whose dying words, "Oh...my...God", are a combination of scornful mimicry and supplication.
3. Setting
a. Setting of time: on a sunny afternoon.
b. Setting of place: Mostly, setting of place happened in New York's Central Park Zoo.
4. Style
- Grammatical structure is informal both in narration and dialogue the point of his style and using the easy word. So it is easy to get understanding.
- Sentence construction; long and short sentence. The author usually used language sentence construction in narration, when he describes some detailed information.
- Diction: the choice of words are easy to understand. Mostly used as dialogues form.
5. Theme
The theme used within this story is isolation.
6. Conclusion
The kind of drama can be related to “man versus society”. This reason is because the story told about human and society especially in conflict that happened between Peter and Jerry.
Senin, 20 Juni 2011
Minggu, 05 Juni 2011
The Proposal (Drama Task)
The Proposal
Name : Ratna Adi Tejaningrum
Nim : A 320080148
Class : G
1. Character and Characterization
a. Stepan Stepanovitch Chubukov
Chubukov is a landowner. Perhaps he is 70 years old. He is a kind-man and polite, for instance to his neighbor. He is relax and senile.
b. Natalya Stepanovna
Natalya is a Chubukov’s daughter. She is 25 years old. Natalya is a talkative girl. She wants to get everything what she wants in the other hand she is ambisious. She is in love, she is like a lovesick cat.
c. Ivan vassilevitch Lomov
Ivan is a neighbor of Chubukov. He is 35 years old, just a critical age. Ivan is a large and hearty. If he gets nervous, his heart is palpitating awfully, especially when he is faced with Natalya. Probably he is afraid with women.
2. Setting
a. Place
It is happened in A drawing-room in Chubukov’s house.
b. Time
It is happened in evening, about 7 p.m.
3. Plot
The plot of the proposal story is a traditional plot structure.
- Exposition: In the evening, at Chubunkov’s house.Ivan Lomov visited to Mr. Chubukov, he wore evening dress, gloves, hat, and so on. Chubunkov was surprised but feels so glad when meet him. Lomov said that he went to propose Natalya (Chubunkov’s daughter). Chubunkov is very happy when hears that and directly accepts the proposal. Lomov feels he is not proper man to Natalya. It is the right time for Lomov to ask Natalya in marriage.
- Complication
When Lomov discussed Oxen meadows is his own, Natalya becomes dies angry and says disagreement. She quarrels with Lomov to get land right. Natalya humiliates Lomov, she thinks that he is a good neighbor but Lomov is just a Land-grabber, Lomov cannot control has emotional sense and shout to Natalya. Natalya complains to her father and ask to him to state that Meadows is Chubukov’s. Lomov blamed Chubukov has taken the Meadows from Lomov’s family. He thought that the Lomov’s is honorable people.
- Climax
The climax is when Lomov and Chubukov humiliate their families each other. Lomov’s heart cannot stop beat. Then he decided to leave that house. After Lomovs left them, Chubukov had forgot to say that actually he had came to propose Natalya. He would to make a proposal. Natalya was shocked when hear that. She wants Lomov comeback soon.
- Resolution
Natalya shall acknowledge that Oxen Meadows is Lomov’s. She also asked to forgive about the debate before. Chubukov is greatly astonished with the alteration of his daughter opinion.
4. Style
The Proposal is dominated with the dialogues or conversation between Ivan Lumov, Natalia, and Chubukov. The writer also used the social diexis such as my dear fellow, my angel, my treasure, and my precious.
5. Conclusion
The conclusion is a relationship between man and society. Because, in this story tells about the relationship between between Ivan Lumov, Natalia, and Chubukov. From the story, we can take message, we must not reckless if we are faced in a problem.
Name : Ratna Adi Tejaningrum
Nim : A 320080148
Class : G
1. Character and Characterization
a. Stepan Stepanovitch Chubukov
Chubukov is a landowner. Perhaps he is 70 years old. He is a kind-man and polite, for instance to his neighbor. He is relax and senile.
b. Natalya Stepanovna
Natalya is a Chubukov’s daughter. She is 25 years old. Natalya is a talkative girl. She wants to get everything what she wants in the other hand she is ambisious. She is in love, she is like a lovesick cat.
c. Ivan vassilevitch Lomov
Ivan is a neighbor of Chubukov. He is 35 years old, just a critical age. Ivan is a large and hearty. If he gets nervous, his heart is palpitating awfully, especially when he is faced with Natalya. Probably he is afraid with women.
2. Setting
a. Place
It is happened in A drawing-room in Chubukov’s house.
b. Time
It is happened in evening, about 7 p.m.
3. Plot
The plot of the proposal story is a traditional plot structure.
- Exposition: In the evening, at Chubunkov’s house.Ivan Lomov visited to Mr. Chubukov, he wore evening dress, gloves, hat, and so on. Chubunkov was surprised but feels so glad when meet him. Lomov said that he went to propose Natalya (Chubunkov’s daughter). Chubunkov is very happy when hears that and directly accepts the proposal. Lomov feels he is not proper man to Natalya. It is the right time for Lomov to ask Natalya in marriage.
- Complication
When Lomov discussed Oxen meadows is his own, Natalya becomes dies angry and says disagreement. She quarrels with Lomov to get land right. Natalya humiliates Lomov, she thinks that he is a good neighbor but Lomov is just a Land-grabber, Lomov cannot control has emotional sense and shout to Natalya. Natalya complains to her father and ask to him to state that Meadows is Chubukov’s. Lomov blamed Chubukov has taken the Meadows from Lomov’s family. He thought that the Lomov’s is honorable people.
- Climax
The climax is when Lomov and Chubukov humiliate their families each other. Lomov’s heart cannot stop beat. Then he decided to leave that house. After Lomovs left them, Chubukov had forgot to say that actually he had came to propose Natalya. He would to make a proposal. Natalya was shocked when hear that. She wants Lomov comeback soon.
- Resolution
Natalya shall acknowledge that Oxen Meadows is Lomov’s. She also asked to forgive about the debate before. Chubukov is greatly astonished with the alteration of his daughter opinion.
4. Style
The Proposal is dominated with the dialogues or conversation between Ivan Lumov, Natalia, and Chubukov. The writer also used the social diexis such as my dear fellow, my angel, my treasure, and my precious.
5. Conclusion
The conclusion is a relationship between man and society. Because, in this story tells about the relationship between between Ivan Lumov, Natalia, and Chubukov. From the story, we can take message, we must not reckless if we are faced in a problem.
Rabu, 18 Mei 2011
The death of Salesman (Second Drama Task)
RATNA ADI TEJANINGRUM
A 320 080 148
Class G
1. The character and characterization of player:
• Willy Loman An aging salesman haunted by a feeling that his life has been a failure. He hallucinates about past events focusing on his dreams for a better tomorrow; the future of his son, Biff, a star football player; and a woman with whom he had an affair while on a sales trip. During his hallucinations, he sometimes talks to himself.
• Linda Loman : Willy’s loyal wife. She accepts her role as a devoted and subservient housewife.
• Biff Loman : Willy’s older son, who has trouble holding a job and getting along with his father. After he returns home from the West, his presence and his failure to get a job exasperate Willy.
• Happy Loman : Willy’s younger son, who has a steady job but is afraid to take risks to better himself
• Charley: Successful businessman who lives next door to Willy. Willy envies him because he is a constant reminder of what Willy is not. Willy snidely says Charley “is liked, but not well liked.” Nevertheless, Charley lends Willy money and even offers him a job.
• Bernard: Charley’s son. He is intelligent, hard-working, and successful–everything Biff Loman is not.
• Ben: Willy’s deceased older brother, who appears only in Willy’s hallucinations. He struck in rich at an early age in South African diamond mines. He symbolizes the success that has eluded Willy.
• Howard Wagner: The son of Willy's former boss, Frank Wagner, whom Willy admired. Howard, who is now Willy’s boss, represents a new breed of business executive, interested more in advancing technology than people. He fires Willy because of his inability to perform satisfactorily.
• Stanley: A waiter at a bar/restaurant where Willy meets his sons.
• The Woman: An employee of a Boston company who has an affair with Willy. She is one of the subjects of his hallucinations.
• Miss Forsythe and Letta : Attractive young women whom Hap and Biff meet in the bar/restaurant.
2. Plot
- Conflict,
- complication,
- climax,
- suspense,
- denouement,
- conclusion
3. Setting
The major setting of the death of salesman is in New York City, and the other setting are around the Brooklyn house of Willy Loman, and in a restaurant.
4. Language Style
- In the death of salesman used traditional grammatical structure (in narration and dialogues).
- In the death of salesman used standard and simple sentence construction (in narration and dialogues). So, it is easy to understand.
5. Point of View
The author of the death of salesman drama, Arthur Miller is as non-participant. He doesn’t introduce himself as a character in this drama story.
6. Theme
By write this play, Miller wants to invite the reader for following his/her heart. Not just follow desires feeling to fulfill the meaningless position of our occupation. We asked to know our strengths and weaknesses. Hard work is what pays off. In general we must distinguish between reality and illusion..
7. Conclusion
In “Death of Salesman” Arthur Miller want to criticism about condition and situation in America. In America was enjoying an economic boom that initiated a significant trend. The absorption of small businesses by large corporations that reduced the importance of the individual worker and increased the importance of the company as a whole and its bottom line. So, I can conclude that in the death of salesman drama story including to MAN VS SOCIETY.
A 320 080 148
Class G
1. The character and characterization of player:
• Willy Loman An aging salesman haunted by a feeling that his life has been a failure. He hallucinates about past events focusing on his dreams for a better tomorrow; the future of his son, Biff, a star football player; and a woman with whom he had an affair while on a sales trip. During his hallucinations, he sometimes talks to himself.
• Linda Loman : Willy’s loyal wife. She accepts her role as a devoted and subservient housewife.
• Biff Loman : Willy’s older son, who has trouble holding a job and getting along with his father. After he returns home from the West, his presence and his failure to get a job exasperate Willy.
• Happy Loman : Willy’s younger son, who has a steady job but is afraid to take risks to better himself
• Charley: Successful businessman who lives next door to Willy. Willy envies him because he is a constant reminder of what Willy is not. Willy snidely says Charley “is liked, but not well liked.” Nevertheless, Charley lends Willy money and even offers him a job.
• Bernard: Charley’s son. He is intelligent, hard-working, and successful–everything Biff Loman is not.
• Ben: Willy’s deceased older brother, who appears only in Willy’s hallucinations. He struck in rich at an early age in South African diamond mines. He symbolizes the success that has eluded Willy.
• Howard Wagner: The son of Willy's former boss, Frank Wagner, whom Willy admired. Howard, who is now Willy’s boss, represents a new breed of business executive, interested more in advancing technology than people. He fires Willy because of his inability to perform satisfactorily.
• Stanley: A waiter at a bar/restaurant where Willy meets his sons.
• The Woman: An employee of a Boston company who has an affair with Willy. She is one of the subjects of his hallucinations.
• Miss Forsythe and Letta : Attractive young women whom Hap and Biff meet in the bar/restaurant.
2. Plot
- Conflict,
- complication,
- climax,
- suspense,
- denouement,
- conclusion
3. Setting
The major setting of the death of salesman is in New York City, and the other setting are around the Brooklyn house of Willy Loman, and in a restaurant.
4. Language Style
- In the death of salesman used traditional grammatical structure (in narration and dialogues).
- In the death of salesman used standard and simple sentence construction (in narration and dialogues). So, it is easy to understand.
5. Point of View
The author of the death of salesman drama, Arthur Miller is as non-participant. He doesn’t introduce himself as a character in this drama story.
6. Theme
By write this play, Miller wants to invite the reader for following his/her heart. Not just follow desires feeling to fulfill the meaningless position of our occupation. We asked to know our strengths and weaknesses. Hard work is what pays off. In general we must distinguish between reality and illusion..
7. Conclusion
In “Death of Salesman” Arthur Miller want to criticism about condition and situation in America. In America was enjoying an economic boom that initiated a significant trend. The absorption of small businesses by large corporations that reduced the importance of the individual worker and increased the importance of the company as a whole and its bottom line. So, I can conclude that in the death of salesman drama story including to MAN VS SOCIETY.
Sabtu, 09 April 2011
Drama Assignment
Drama Assignment
The Lesson Drama Analysis
By: Ratna Adi Tejaningrum
A 320 080 148
Class G
The Character of The Lesson:
1. The professor (male), he is fifty and sixty years old.
2. The girl pupil (female), she is eighteen years old.
3. The maid(female), she is forty-five and fifty years old.
The characterizations in ‘The Lesson’:
1. The Professor (male) who is 50 to 60 years old, he is a smart or an intelligent people, selfish, cruel (because he has heart to kill his student), and he has a psychology problem.
2. The Pupil (female), she has a big spirit and strong motivation to study, and then she is a polite person, discipline, confident of herself, but she has not strong body.
3. The Maid (female), she is very loyal to her boss (Professor), innocent person, brave, strong, and she has a psychology problem like a professor (her boss).
Plot:
The drama uses the traditional plot structure so there are four sequential levels they are:
Exposition
It contains the introduction of the character and characterization, the problem, and also situation. In this sequential level the writer shows the purpose what are the pupil’s purpose by seeing the professor in his house.
Complication
Complication involves the tension of conflicts. The part of complication is starting from when professor was give the lesson until he lost his control because he cannot control himself.
Climax
The climax happen when the complication on the highest tension. In The Lesson the climax is when the professor lost his control and then he killed the pupil. And finally he realized that he was killing his pupil.
Resolution
Resolution is the end of the story. In this case the part of resolution is after professor killed the pupil then the maid entered his room, then they were hide the pupil, and actually the pupil that had killed by the professor are forty young students.
Setting of Place and Time:
Place: the office or house of the professor (in the dining room), in side of the maid house, at an endless stream of words.
Time: in the morning when summer season on June 1950.
Language Style:
In The Lesson drama comedy, the writer uses a simple or short and polite language, so it makes easy to understand for the readers.
Point of view:
The lesson (a drama comic) presents the story in third-person point of view. The author points to all character and positioning them as third person, so he knows the entire of story.
Theme:
This story has many values that builder the main idea of the story. There are comedy, horror, education, and psychological. So, we can get many knowledge by reading this drama comedy.
Conclusion:
The Lesson is included of man and society drama, because it tells about the relation between 'man versus society' (the relationship of the professor and the pupil, the pupil and the maid, and the professor and the maid).
The Lesson Drama Analysis
By: Ratna Adi Tejaningrum
A 320 080 148
Class G
The Character of The Lesson:
1. The professor (male), he is fifty and sixty years old.
2. The girl pupil (female), she is eighteen years old.
3. The maid(female), she is forty-five and fifty years old.
The characterizations in ‘The Lesson’:
1. The Professor (male) who is 50 to 60 years old, he is a smart or an intelligent people, selfish, cruel (because he has heart to kill his student), and he has a psychology problem.
2. The Pupil (female), she has a big spirit and strong motivation to study, and then she is a polite person, discipline, confident of herself, but she has not strong body.
3. The Maid (female), she is very loyal to her boss (Professor), innocent person, brave, strong, and she has a psychology problem like a professor (her boss).
Plot:
The drama uses the traditional plot structure so there are four sequential levels they are:
Exposition
It contains the introduction of the character and characterization, the problem, and also situation. In this sequential level the writer shows the purpose what are the pupil’s purpose by seeing the professor in his house.
Complication
Complication involves the tension of conflicts. The part of complication is starting from when professor was give the lesson until he lost his control because he cannot control himself.
Climax
The climax happen when the complication on the highest tension. In The Lesson the climax is when the professor lost his control and then he killed the pupil. And finally he realized that he was killing his pupil.
Resolution
Resolution is the end of the story. In this case the part of resolution is after professor killed the pupil then the maid entered his room, then they were hide the pupil, and actually the pupil that had killed by the professor are forty young students.
Setting of Place and Time:
Place: the office or house of the professor (in the dining room), in side of the maid house, at an endless stream of words.
Time: in the morning when summer season on June 1950.
Language Style:
In The Lesson drama comedy, the writer uses a simple or short and polite language, so it makes easy to understand for the readers.
Point of view:
The lesson (a drama comic) presents the story in third-person point of view. The author points to all character and positioning them as third person, so he knows the entire of story.
Theme:
This story has many values that builder the main idea of the story. There are comedy, horror, education, and psychological. So, we can get many knowledge by reading this drama comedy.
Conclusion:
The Lesson is included of man and society drama, because it tells about the relation between 'man versus society' (the relationship of the professor and the pupil, the pupil and the maid, and the professor and the maid).
Kamis, 07 April 2011
daftar nama kelompok drama SYMPHA
Daftar Nama Kelompok Drama SYMPHA
1. Sri Meilani L A 320 080 022
2. Narko A 320 080 041
3. Sasa Astra P A 320 080 053
4. Isnaini Wahyu Palupi A 320 080 058
5. Dea Intan Ngestihati A 320 080 059
6. Hanif Nurcholish A A 320 080 061
7. Sholikhah Arum Sari A 320 080 064
8. Raya Gilang A 320 080 065
9. Arif Setyanto A 320 080 074
10. Fadholy Prastika A 320 080 075
11. Riski Indah K A 320 080 081
12. Sri Wahyuni A 320 080 082
13. Risa Wardani A 320 080 083
14. Miftahul Jannah A 320 080 084
15. Deka Pratiwi A 320 080 085
16. Ratih Nasalia Y A 320 080 087
17. Khoerul Huda A 320 080 089
18. Utami Saraswati A 320 080 090
19. Atik Pramitasih A 320 080 091
20. Kristiana A 320 080 093
21. Dwi Susilowati A 320 080 095
22. Tri Mustikaningsih A 320 080 096
23. Moh. Khomarudin A 320 080 097
24. Vima Setiyawati A 320 080 098
25. Arsida S W A 320 080 100
26. Yulian Ilham A 320 080 101
27. Eli Fatmawati A 320 080 102
28. Denik Fajar A 320 080 103
29. Riska Amalia R A 320 080 106
30. Arif Widhi A 320 080 107
31. Laili Agustina A 320 080 109
32. Linda Pratiwi A 320 080 110
33. Ririn Tri Jantini A 320 080 111
34. Rendy Latief A 320 080 112
35. Saktiningtyas G W A 320 080 113
36. Septi Triana A 320 080 114
37. Mar’atush Sholihah A 320 080 115
38. Ambari Tri Hastuti A 320 080 116
39. Trianasari A 320 080 117
40. Tri Maryati A 320 080 119
41. Ratna Adi Tejaningrum A 320 080 148
42. Winda Dwi Lestari A 320 080 152
43. Ninik Suryani A 320 080 155
44. Septiana A 320 080 156
45. Maila Huda A 320 080 160
46. Leni A 320 080 161
47. Yudi Susanti A 320 080 274
48. Fitria Nur Santi A 320 080 305
49. Setyo Wati A 320 080 325
50. Sulis Priyanto A 320 080 164
51. Kunang Sutanto A 320 090 238
1. Sri Meilani L A 320 080 022
2. Narko A 320 080 041
3. Sasa Astra P A 320 080 053
4. Isnaini Wahyu Palupi A 320 080 058
5. Dea Intan Ngestihati A 320 080 059
6. Hanif Nurcholish A A 320 080 061
7. Sholikhah Arum Sari A 320 080 064
8. Raya Gilang A 320 080 065
9. Arif Setyanto A 320 080 074
10. Fadholy Prastika A 320 080 075
11. Riski Indah K A 320 080 081
12. Sri Wahyuni A 320 080 082
13. Risa Wardani A 320 080 083
14. Miftahul Jannah A 320 080 084
15. Deka Pratiwi A 320 080 085
16. Ratih Nasalia Y A 320 080 087
17. Khoerul Huda A 320 080 089
18. Utami Saraswati A 320 080 090
19. Atik Pramitasih A 320 080 091
20. Kristiana A 320 080 093
21. Dwi Susilowati A 320 080 095
22. Tri Mustikaningsih A 320 080 096
23. Moh. Khomarudin A 320 080 097
24. Vima Setiyawati A 320 080 098
25. Arsida S W A 320 080 100
26. Yulian Ilham A 320 080 101
27. Eli Fatmawati A 320 080 102
28. Denik Fajar A 320 080 103
29. Riska Amalia R A 320 080 106
30. Arif Widhi A 320 080 107
31. Laili Agustina A 320 080 109
32. Linda Pratiwi A 320 080 110
33. Ririn Tri Jantini A 320 080 111
34. Rendy Latief A 320 080 112
35. Saktiningtyas G W A 320 080 113
36. Septi Triana A 320 080 114
37. Mar’atush Sholihah A 320 080 115
38. Ambari Tri Hastuti A 320 080 116
39. Trianasari A 320 080 117
40. Tri Maryati A 320 080 119
41. Ratna Adi Tejaningrum A 320 080 148
42. Winda Dwi Lestari A 320 080 152
43. Ninik Suryani A 320 080 155
44. Septiana A 320 080 156
45. Maila Huda A 320 080 160
46. Leni A 320 080 161
47. Yudi Susanti A 320 080 274
48. Fitria Nur Santi A 320 080 305
49. Setyo Wati A 320 080 325
50. Sulis Priyanto A 320 080 164
51. Kunang Sutanto A 320 090 238
Langganan:
Komentar (Atom)